A response to LambdaConf's decision by someone who was consulted

Re:A response to LambdaConf's decision by someone who was co... by calibraxis on Monday April 04, 2016 @08:18AM (#11421256)

Why? It's a non-sequitur. Neil Degrasse Tyson said "the natural world". IQ tests are fleeting human-made constructs which have nothing to do with laws of the universe. And to talk of "scientific consensus" regarding social pseudo-science...

The whole point is to attack Blacks using techniques of so-called "scientific racism".

(And not discussing racist pseudo-science is merely protection of your own intelligence. My brief neglect to cite evidence warned me that exposure to low standards made my own slip! :)

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:A response to LambdaConf's decision by someone who was co... by dang on Wednesday April 06, 2016 @03:03AM (#11437132)

Your account has also taken a wrong turn into using this site exclusively for ideological ranting. We haven't banned you because I don't think you're doing it on purpose, but please stop doing it. It's really tedious.

The enemies who blast this stuff at each other resemble no one so much as each other. Meanwhile the rest of us just want to get away from it. It isn't productive, and it spoils HN for things that are actually interesting, which spoils its whole purpose.

[ Parent | on HN ]