News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Slack raises $200M at $3.8B valuation for business messaging by ams6110 on Friday April 01, 2016 @04:27PM (#11408301)
I'm sort of astounded at the demand for these products. Instant messaging/chat/constant interruptions is an antipattern in my book. I don't use Slack or have any other instant messaging running on my desktop. I used to, but found it highly annoying. I just use email, and check it a few times a day. What is the need to suck on this firehose of instant information about all kinds of mundane events?
Re:Slack raises $200M at $3.8B valuation for business messaging by edgyswingset on Friday April 01, 2016 @04:49PM (#11408502)
I think this is highly dependent on culture and the type of work you're doing. Is the software you're doing organized such that you can effectively lock yourself away for an entire day and just solve problems? If so, you're probably not going to see much value from Slack, if any.

But what if you do need to collaborate on pieces constantly? Bouncing emails back and forth isn't the best. If you don't have an office environment that's conducive to collaborating like that, slack is also a boon here. Doubly so if members of the team are distributed. What if you've got issues with your email where there's a ton of it, and 90% of it is only mildly important? If lots of the people sending out that email instead just sent chats to a channel that you turn off notifications for, you won't see notifications for it and your inbox is cleaner.

Of course it can be disastrous, with channels turning into nothing but a bunch of GIF sharing and other stupid shit. The onus is on the team to keep work channels clean and focused, and have appropriate channels for goofy stuff that people will naturally tend to participate in.

Note that I'm not saying whether or not this ultimately allows work to happen more efficiently. I honestly can't tell if using Slack makes things easier in the long run, but I certainly prefer using it over email if I can.

Re:Slack raises $200M at $3.8B valuation for business messaging by booop on Saturday April 02, 2016 @06:37AM (#11411019)
> Bouncing emails back and forth isn't the best.

Seems to work just fine for the linux kernel.

Re:Slack raises $200M at $3.8B valuation for business messaging by enraged_camel on Friday April 01, 2016 @05:38PM (#11408800)
On the contrary, I think using a single tool (i.e. email) for every type of communication is the anti-pattern. The fact of the matter is that real-time chat is much better suited for most types of conversations that happen in a typical workplace.

My policy is that if the email is going to be less than two paragraphs, it's better to send it as a Slack message (or IRC or whatever your team uses). But if you need to elaborate on an idea, or bring someone up to speed on something, then write an email, and make sure it's exhaustive.

Re:Slack raises $200M at $3.8B valuation for business messaging by z6 on Saturday April 02, 2016 @02:20AM (#11410481)
Yeah, I don't get it either. The majority of what I've seen at my company is giphy spam in every channel. The vast majority of people constantly check slack for any giphy updates or other BS. Direct messages are distracting because they are intrusive even if they're not that important right now. The whole thing is anti-productivity masquerading as collaboration.

I get its uses, but I rarely see those in practice.

Re:Slack raises $200M at $3.8B valuation for business messaging by st3v3r on Friday April 01, 2016 @05:32PM (#11408761)
"Instant messaging/chat/constant interruptions is an antipattern in my book"

It's a lot better than someone coming over to your desk and poking you.

Re:Slack raises $200M at $3.8B valuation for business messaging by rokhayakebe on Friday April 01, 2016 @07:40PM (#11409376)
If everybody I knew were emailing instead of texting, chatting, calling, video calling, I would have much better relationships, professional and personal.
Re:Slack raises $200M at $3.8B valuation for business messaging by foota on Saturday April 02, 2016 @02:28AM (#11410492)
Can I ask why you feel that way about personal relationships?
Re:Slack raises $200M at $3.8B valuation for business messaging by rokhayakebe on Saturday April 02, 2016 @04:56AM (#11410806)
Because most talk is reflexive and not thought-through. When you write emails you are forced to think and express yourself in the best way possible.
Re:Slack raises $200M at $3.8B valuation for business messaging by PhasmaFelis on Saturday April 02, 2016 @01:25AM (#11410361)
Just to clarify, are you asking about the use of instant messaging in a work environment, or at all? I can see an argument that it's counterproductive at work, but the purely social utility has been obvious for decades; it basically evolved out of IRC.