Re:Google 'mic drop' Gmail joke for April Fools' day backfires
by sp332 on Friday April 01, 2016 @01:12PM
(#11406553)
True. Doesn't help anyone else who wants to read the blogs though. And even thought the storage is redundant, the fact that it's controlled by a single company makes it a single point of failure. I also hope Geocities is around somewhere and is recovered at some point in the future.
Re:Google 'mic drop' Gmail joke for April Fools' day backfires
by godshatter on Friday April 01, 2016 @03:17PM
(#11407712)
A lot of Geocities was archived. You can access one of them at reocities.com. There is also a 650+ GB torrent out there containing the archived sites. It's still a work in progress, apparently, but perusing the "neighborhoods" on reocities.com brings back memories.
Re:Google 'mic drop' Gmail joke for April Fools' day backfires
by sp332 on Friday April 01, 2016 @04:01PM
(#11408068)
The torrent is not very good, and anyway there aren't really any seeds anymore. It's better to get it from the Internet Archive https://archive.org/details/archiveteam-geocities This script makes downloading more convenient: http://blog.geocities.institute/archives/3209
Re:Google 'mic drop' Gmail joke for April Fools' day backfires
by godshatter on Friday April 01, 2016 @04:23PM
(#11408261)
Nice, thanks for the links.
Re:Google 'mic drop' Gmail joke for April Fools' day backfires
by Namrog84 on Friday April 01, 2016 @02:56PM
(#11407539)
There were definitely some good things lost with geocities :(
Re:Google 'mic drop' Gmail joke for April Fools' day backfires
by Tyr42 on Friday April 01, 2016 @02:52PM
(#11407496)
I'm pretty sure you're mistaken.
I can only speak about browser history sync, but it gets deleted after 6 weeks.
Someone broke something and it was producing mangled data. 6 weeks was the "cliff" for when mangled data stopped being visible.
Re:Google 'mic drop' Gmail joke for April Fools' day backfires
by nunobrito on Friday April 01, 2016 @05:27PM
(#11408734)
You might be right, I'm always suspecting that they hoard as much data as they can. That would be a very googly thing to happen.
Mangling data is an interesting thing you raise. Would reveal some issues with their professionalism. Albeit after the disaster we watched today on their April's 1st joke, I wouldn't be surprised if indeed that was the (sad) case as you mention.. :/
If you look on the Google file system, it has no support for deleting files (data is overwritten) and Google itself has a running business model around hoarding data, would make no sense to lose something that might be valuable to them in the future just for the sake of saving some storage.