Re:Google 'mic drop' Gmail joke for April Fools' day backfires
by CaptSpify on Friday April 01, 2016 @10:13AM
(#11404864)
I don't understand how that proves anything one way or the other. Could they not have just left Reader on the old infrastructure?
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:Google 'mic drop' Gmail joke for April Fools' day backfires
by euyyn on Friday April 01, 2016 @01:00PM
(#11406434)
As someone's that maintained deprecated services, I can say that's easier thought than done. Each piece underneath you will eventually ask you to migrate off it, for any number of reasons: It is deprecated itself and being removed, or it has a bug that was fixed in another version, ... Then the replacement / new version won't support all your use cases, so you need to coordinate with them development of that support.
And this is all only about code, not about the cost of keeping the service running with good availability on old infrastructure.
The TL;DR is: Maintenance is never free.
Re:Google 'mic drop' Gmail joke for April Fools' day backfires
by Godel_unicode on Saturday April 02, 2016 @12:57AM
(#11410282)
This. Parents comment is typical of management, and frankly I applaud Google for having the confidence to ignore it rather than incurring all of the technical debt.