Re:Mark Zuckerberg × H&M
by bArray on Friday April 01, 2016 @03:23AM
(#11403282)
Good shout, although a quick duck search didn't throw anything up for them doing anything long-term related. I was under the impression they have a "newest is best" policy. Happy to be shown differently though.
Re:Mark Zuckerberg × H&M
by mhd on Friday April 01, 2016 @03:25AM
(#11403294)
I'd pay for model 2.0 of this: Send in a picture so they can get your complexion, take some basic measurements, then get a stack of suitable t-shirts and fitting jeans, maybe with a subscription option.
For me preferably with no visible brands and organic cotton, although whether that should be just another option or vital to the branding of the supplier is open for discussion.
Because I already own too much stuff - I'm an average person and like anybody else: About half of the items in my wardrobe never get worn. I'm concerned about labour conditions and the environment - if people buy less new stuff, both will be better off.
Re:Mark Zuckerberg × H&M
by manav on Friday April 01, 2016 @03:07AM
(#11403207)
Why?
To me this feels like a lesser version of what would have been a Uniqlo Steve Jobs turtleneck.
If it was for charity... a maybe, but really? On another note, I've found betabrand to be interesting for this kind of wear although slightly overpriced, though not as bad as this post.
Re:Mark Zuckerberg × H&M
by RForFashion on Saturday April 02, 2016 @06:17AM
(#11410982)
You can now get it for charity - I'm auctioning one pack at: http://www.ebay.de/itm/-/301916911250 and the profits will be donated to Greenpeace (for their "Detox Fashion" campaign) and Clean Clothes Campaign
Background: I've send H&M an enthusiastic email, because I'm concerned about labour conditions and the environment. If people buy less, both will be off better.
Re:Mark Zuckerberg × H&M
by groundCode on Friday April 01, 2016 @03:19AM
(#11403260)
"Two pairs of black shirts.
Two pairs of black pants.
One pair of combat boots.
Two pairs of black socks.
One black jacket.
$300 personal burial money."
Is this....for real? I mean...I guess it kinda makes sense?
looks at date
sigh
Edit: I think this confirms my thinking: https://www.nginx.com/blog/nginx-1-6-1-7-released/
For me preferably with no visible brands and organic cotton, although whether that should be just another option or vital to the branding of the supplier is open for discussion.
I'm auctioning this for charity: http://www.ebay.de/itm/-/301916911250
All proceeds will go to Greenpeace (for their "Detox Fashion" campaign) and Clean Clothes Campaign More info: * http://www.greenpeace.org/international/en/campaigns/detox/f... * http://www.cleanclothes.org/
Because I already own too much stuff - I'm an average person and like anybody else: About half of the items in my wardrobe never get worn. I'm concerned about labour conditions and the environment - if people buy less new stuff, both will be better off.
Please see details, bid on and spread the news for: http://www.ebay.de/itm/-/301916911250
To me this feels like a lesser version of what would have been a Uniqlo Steve Jobs turtleneck.
If it was for charity... a maybe, but really? On another note, I've found betabrand to be interesting for this kind of wear although slightly overpriced, though not as bad as this post.
Literally, you could buy seven shirt that looks like that for $5 each
Pants you could get for $20
In total if this is more expensive than $55 I hope the profit would go to philanthropy. Especially if they're throwing that word around.
Background: I've send H&M an enthusiastic email, because I'm concerned about labour conditions and the environment. If people buy less, both will be off better.
So, here's your chance - please see details, bid on and spread the news for: http://www.ebay.de/itm/-/301916911250