News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:FBI agrees to unlock iPhone for Arkansas prosecutor by einarvollset on Thursday March 31, 2016 @01:02AM (#11395090)
So are you arguing that the police should not explore all reasonable sources of information when investigating a crime?

You know, just sample a few and then if nothing comes up, just infer that everything is kosher?

Re:FBI agrees to unlock iPhone for Arkansas prosecutor by bediger4000 on Thursday March 31, 2016 @01:20AM (#11395152)
Dude... you were the one that asked "How so?" in response to a statement that nothing of value would be recovered from the iPhone that the FBI was using as a means of creating a precedent. I gave you the "how so" reasons, I didn't say anything about not exploring reasonable sources of information. If FBI investigative time is a scarce resource, I would expect them to prioritize the sources of information, putting "less likely to yeild results" lower in the prioritized list. I would also expect them to stop investigating the material way down on the priority list if the material high on the priority list had yielded results.
Re:FBI agrees to unlock iPhone for Arkansas prosecutor by einarvollset on Thursday March 31, 2016 @11:11PM (#11402299)
Dude. Clearly you have insights into this investigation that neither I, any media outlet or even in fact the FBI even has. So in that case, congrats, you win.