News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:U.S. Drops California Case Against Apple After Accessing ... by alanwatts on Tuesday March 29, 2016 @09:44AM (#11381369)
>I find it so frustrating when people conflate "people" with "persons"

They are virtually synonymous. People is a plural form of person. Most people don't speak legalese.

Re:U.S. Drops California Case Against Apple After Accessing ... by LordKano on Tuesday March 29, 2016 @11:13AM (#11382037)
People is a plural form of person.

Not in the context of the Constitution. "The people" makes reference to American Citizens. "Person" makes reference to legal persons.

Re:U.S. Drops California Case Against Apple After Accessing ... by alanwatts on Tuesday March 29, 2016 @03:26PM (#11384158)
The first and original definition of "person" is "a human being".

An alternate, legal definition is "a corporation."

Lets break down that definition and dive deeper into the abstraction.

A law is a piece of paper with words written on it that some people agree on.

A corporation is created by filing articles of incorporation. Again, this is a piece of paper with words written on it.

So, in reality using law to define a corporation as a person you have a piece of paper saying a piece of paper is a human being.

Re:U.S. Drops California Case Against Apple After Accessing ... by LordKano on Tuesday March 29, 2016 @04:21PM (#11384557)
Legal and common definitions are often at odds.

Legally, marijuana and cocaine are "narcotics" but pharmacologically they are not.

The law defines personhood for biological entities too.

One minute before birth, it's not a legal person. One second after birth, it is a legal person.

This is nothing new.

If you don't like the law, convince enough people that the law should be changed.