News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Follow the money: Apple vs. the FBI by lisper on Monday March 28, 2016 @12:07PM (#11375068)
What difference does it make if the author is famous or not? Famous people get things just as wrong as non-famous people. (And I have no idea why you think the article defies common sense. It seems like a perfectly cogent argument to me.)
Re:Follow the money: Apple vs. the FBI by kbenson on Monday March 28, 2016 @12:38PM (#11375320)
I agree that fame should not be a sole qualifying attribute for getting on the front page here, but I think fame can be a qualifying factor, if used appropriately. That is, if a person is famous for being prescient in items relevant to the post, or if they are well known or respected in that sphere, that can help carry some legitimacy to their views to those that aren't entirely capable of assessing the merits of the argument, and would rather not spend time researching claims from someone that turns out to be a rambling idiot.

There are also pieces by those famous that are less arguments, and more calls to action, in which the person't fame, or reputation, helps push the message, and as such it can be factored in as part of the message. It becomes useful for assessing how widespread the reach of the message will be. E.g. Brad Pitt speaking our against a social injustice vs Kim Kardashian commenting on fiscal policy. In one the fame helps spread the message (even if it doesn't, or at least shouldn't change the merits of the message itself), in the other the fame is irrelevant.

For Stross, he's a fairly famous hard Science Fiction author, he's commented on the future and fiscal issues before, and has written books regarding interstellar money systems (haven't read yet) and possible problems with them. His fame in this area makes me want to see what he has to say, we'll see if I agree after I finish reading it...

Re:Follow the money: Apple vs. the FBI by marincounty on Monday March 28, 2016 @05:10PM (#11377415)
The late Christopher Reeve said it perfectecly. It never got any coverage, but it made me instantly like him more.

Basically he got tired of reporters asking his opinion--on everything. It was right after Superman. He said in a tired voice, "Why are you asking for my opinion? Why us actors? Why not the Janitor down the hall. Guess what--that Janitor probally knows more? We read lines other people wrote?"

The reporter walked away, like Superman didn't save the day?

Re:Follow the money: Apple vs. the FBI by Apocryphon on Monday March 28, 2016 @02:12PM (#11376119)
Fame is a pretty important social indicator.
Re:Follow the money: Apple vs. the FBI by TheLogothete on Monday March 28, 2016 @01:31PM (#11375735)
>What difference does it make if the author is famous or not?

It would explain why this jibberish is #1 on HN.