Re:Moving Beyond the OOP Obsession
by sklogic on Monday March 28, 2016 @08:00AM
(#11373735)
A value, with a type. Nothing else. Stop highjacking everything into your OO religion. If you take everything of a value that originated elsewhere, there will be nothing left in the OOD.
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Many of your comments have been breaking the HN guidelines. Please stop being uncivil and calling names.
You clearly know enough to make substantive contributions, which is great for this forum, but it you keep being rude, we'll have to ban you. So please don't.
We detached this subthread from https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=11373716 and marked it off-topic.
Re:Moving Beyond the OOP Obsession
by heartsucker on Monday March 28, 2016 @08:32AM
(#11373836)
> Stop highjacking everything into your OO religion.
The parent to your post seemed to have a legitimate question, and you're being snarky. You could have left out everything after the first sentence or even explained what that means in practice.
It was a bad argument disguised as a "question". I rarely tolerate this sort of a discourse.
Okay, now give me some collection like object, who can handle everything. No, don't use void*.
There are some benefits if everything is an object, like generics.
Ever seen STL? It is as anti-OOP by design as it gets.
Hello, it's 2016. Did you heard Java or C#? Or even Delphi?
None of the other generic containers library got anything to do with OOP.
A value with a type is an object?
What else do we need? “Methods”? Why?
I very strongly support the proposed Unified call syntax.