News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Concurrency in Rust by Manishearth on Sunday March 27, 2016 @08:09PM (#11372062)
> I do see the need to have a memory allocation approach that can handle OOM gracefully.

Do you find anything wrong with inserting an allocator that panics on OOM (IIRC the default one aborts on OOM) and using `std::panic::recover` to catch the panic? This is the same as throwing and catching an exception. Note that `recover()` is designed to be exception safe by default.

(There soon will be a way to make std heap APIs like box and vec use Result, which might be neater)

Re:Concurrency in Rust by nitrogen on Monday March 28, 2016 @02:14AM (#11372974)
I don't myself, no, but I haven't dived into Rust yet. I'm assuming that recovery can happen at a point where data can still be saved.
Re:Concurrency in Rust by Manishearth on Monday March 28, 2016 @10:58AM (#11374606)
Yeah.