Re:Angola’s Wikipedia Pirates Are Exposing the Problems with...
by tobitobi on Friday March 25, 2016 @07:55AM
(#11359556)
I can understand the sentiment of feeling offended by the term "colonialism" when giving away something for free. It implies a negative intent when really people/organizations intended to do something charitable.
That said, I can also understand the sentiment of feeling "colonialized" when people are only allowed to use something under conditions/mores imposed by a "foreign party".
Different world views then? I think it's more like two sides of the same coin...
Re:Angola’s Wikipedia Pirates Are Exposing the Problems with...
by jtnegrotto on Friday March 25, 2016 @09:30AM
(#11359891)
It might be more comparable to missionary work. Wikipedia is providing valuable resources, but that charitable work can be interwoven with foreign ideals.
But it seems like Wikipedia are conscious of that, so they've taken a hands-off approach to this.
I was just questioning the sense of entitlement that is apparently hidden in the "colonialism" criticism, but this seems to be so ideological that it's hard to get to a basic agreement. Different views on the world, I guess.