Re:The Immobile Masses: Why Traffic Is Awful and Public Tran...
by whorleater on Thursday March 24, 2016 @02:52PM
(#11355335)
There's a fairly low ceiling in terms of walkability within cities though. Once you exceed a certain distance, no amount of walkability is going to convince people to walk, and rent/housing prices within the walking distance tend to be much higher than those outside, thus exacerbating the issue of public transportation.
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:The Immobile Masses: Why Traffic Is Awful and Public Tran...
by dkopi on Thursday March 24, 2016 @03:00PM
(#11355412)
If you're able to walk for 95% of your needs, public transit, taxis, uber and zipcars solve the other 5%.
If you're only able to walk for 5% of your needs, public transit isn't going to help you much.
Rent/Housing does indeed cost more in walk-able areas. That's a great signal telling us that there's a lot of demand for walk-able neighborhoods, and urban planning should allow a lot more of them.
Re:The Immobile Masses: Why Traffic Is Awful and Public Tran...
by thatfrenchguy on Thursday March 24, 2016 @03:37PM
(#11355764)
Well going to work is probably 90% of your moving needs.
So if you live 45 minutes by train from where you're working and there is an actual train there, public transit helps you a lot.
Re:The Immobile Masses: Why Traffic Is Awful and Public Tran...
by nostrebored on Thursday March 24, 2016 @07:16PM
(#11357298)
That's a woefully inaccurate representation of my life and the life of my friends. Do more things.