Re:$115M verdict in Hulk Hogan sex-tape lawsuit could wipe o...
by Kristine1975 on Saturday March 19, 2016 @12:09PM
(#11319033)
>Do you think a publication should be able to publish facts about a person?
Yes.
>Do you think a publication should be able to publish facts about a person without their consent?
Depends. Is it important that other people know these facts, as in "will they be harmed/make bad decisions if they don't know them"? (Think knowledge about a politician.)
>Do you think a publication should be able to publish facts about a person that were initially obtained illegally but were given to the publication? (see wikileaks…etc)
Yes.
>Do you think a publication should be able to publish facts about a person without their consent?
Depends. Is it important that other people know these facts, as in "will they be harmed/make bad decisions if they don't know them"? (Think knowledge about a politician.)
>Do you think a publication should be able to publish facts about a person that were initially obtained illegally but were given to the publication? (see wikileaks…etc)
See question two.