Re:Why smart people are better off with fewer friends
by pboutros on Friday March 18, 2016 @07:22PM
(#11316092)
I've reread it 3-4 times, and I'm having a hard time understanding what the argument is. Typically, you'd expect something like
> if p, then q
> if q, then z
but this article reads as
> if p, then q
> if z, then m
Except that it's all wrapped in language - the ideas look like they should flow together, but they don't. There are probably missing steps in the analysis. Might be a case of over-summarization by the journalist.
> if p, then q
> if q, then z
but this article reads as
> if p, then q
> if z, then m
Except that it's all wrapped in language - the ideas look like they should flow together, but they don't. There are probably missing steps in the analysis. Might be a case of over-summarization by the journalist.