Once thought safe, DDR4 memory shown to be vulnerable to “Rowhammer”

Re:Once thought safe, DDR4 memory shown to be vulnerable to ... by yuhong on Friday March 18, 2016 @02:26PM (#11313771)

I wonder what is the return rate for memory due to this test.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Once thought safe, DDR4 memory shown to be vulnerable to ... by cnvogel on Sunday March 20, 2016 @04:05AM (#11322211)

I guess the number of "enthusiasts" running Memtest on their (or their acquaintances') PCs still is miniscule. So in my opinion no one would notice, except if a return questionnaire explicitly included a

    [√] error while using memtest

field. Keep in mind that newer versions of Microsoft's Windows include their own memory tester. Most people will, if at all, use this.

[ Parent | on HN ]