Re:NSA refused Clinton a secure BlackBerry like Obama, so sh...
by ars on Friday March 18, 2016 @01:14AM
(#11310048)
She has shown she can not be trusted to listen when told "What you are doing is not secure".
Not having what you want, even when you have a right to it, is not an excuse to do it anyway.
Re:NSA refused Clinton a secure BlackBerry like Obama, so sh...
by chris_wot on Friday March 18, 2016 @06:48PM
(#11315876)
Either she does understand security, or she doesn't. Which is it, in your opinion? Genuinely curious.
Re:NSA refused Clinton a secure BlackBerry like Obama, so sh...
by ars on Monday March 21, 2016 @12:03AM
(#11326166)
She doesn't care about it. Which to me means (i.e. is caused by) "doesn't understand [the need] for it".
She probably says things like "it's fine, it's secure enough".
I have a hard believing anyone would understand it and still not care.
All that you have shown here is that the people tasked with securing sensitive information failed to do so.
If Clinton becomes President, then she'll be provided with a secure mode of communication, regardless of what the security person thinks of it. So as President, she'll be able to access secret and classified information.