Re:How One Hardware Startup Solved Silicon Valley’s “Woman P...
by jeffdavis on Thursday March 17, 2016 @01:00AM
(#11302671)
I didn't say or imply anywhere that they were at odds, nor do I think they are in general.
Rather, the business success part of the narrative was missing in this particular case, leaving an inconclusive feeling.
I recommend that you give others the benefit of the doubt and make a real effort to understand what they are trying to say, rather than assuming they are wrong merely because the comment triggers a politically-incorrect reflex. You're comment leads to an environment where people are afraid to contribute new ideas to the discussion.
Re:How One Hardware Startup Solved Silicon Valley’s “Woman P...
by 13thLetter on Wednesday March 16, 2016 @06:03PM
(#11301030)
"It's foolish, and, honestly, kind of offensive, to imply that pushing diversity and at the same time pushing business success are somehow at odds with each other."
Offensive? We're not even allowed to disagree with you about meta-level issues now? Nobody is being insulted or harassed, no one is being subjected to prejudicial remarks about any facet of their being -- and yet it's still, somehow, offensive?
Re:How One Hardware Startup Solved Silicon Valley’s “Woman P...
by Dain42 on Thursday March 17, 2016 @05:51PM
(#11307912)
By saying, "Pushing to get more even representation is at odds with business success or product quality," which is often outright stated and even more often pretty directly implied, people are basically saying, "Those 'diverse' people are inherently poorer workers with worse quality output." That's the subtext, and that's what I think is kind of offensive about that line of argument.
https://gimletmedia.com/episode/52-raising-the-bar/