News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:How the New York Times Sandbagged Bernie Sanders by gerty on Wednesday March 16, 2016 @10:03AM (#11297349)
> My conclusion is that the favorability ratings are bullshit.

Primary election results do not support this theory. Clinton has very high favorability among self-declared Democrats, something like 70-80 % off the top of my head. Her favorability declines fast with Independents and Republican voters. I don't have the data in front of me but I could bet Sanders won independent vote in every primary where independents were allowed to vote, notably Michigan. Noone can't say if it's favorability only but correlation is hard to dispute.

Re:How the New York Times Sandbagged Bernie Sanders by huac on Wednesday March 16, 2016 @10:09AM (#11297389)
Moderate favorability: Sanders 58-38, Clinton 49-45 (https://pbs.twimg.com/media/Cdh297lWEAAihp-.jpg:large)

Independent favorability: Sanders 50-39, Clinton 31-60 (https://pbs.twimg.com/media/Cdh1L0vXEAEokgY.jpg:large)

Worth noting that among independents, Clinton has a net -29 which is second worst only to Trump at -32, and is worse than Cruz at -27.