From Twitter of one of the demo creators:
"I was using GTX 980, which runs it at 1440 in the editor with perf to spare"
Re:Adam
by binarycrusader on Wednesday March 16, 2016 @10:53AM
(#11297775)
Except that was in reference to the demo they gave at GDC while using the editor. Not necessarily the card used to render the demo, someone should ask.
Re:Adam
by binarycrusader on Wednesday March 16, 2016 @01:13AM
(#11295192)
From the YouTube comments:
Processor: Octacore Intel Core i7 6th Generation GPU: Nvidia GeForce Titan X (3x SLI)
Re:Adam
by binarycrusader on Wednesday March 16, 2016 @06:42PM
(#11301254)
Update from one of the demo authors:
"The Adam demo runs in 1440p at 30fps on a GTX 980, by the way :) See it running real-time at the Unity booth at GDC!"
https://twitter.com/robertcupisz/status/710160351568986112
So it's very likely that the YouTube video was rendered with far better hardware.
Re:Adam
by hyperpallium on Wednesday March 16, 2016 @08:07AM
(#11296635)
And one Titan X gives 6.6 TFLOPS, single precision (peak)
From the youtube comments that was also buddy pulling a guess out of his butt.
Was the commenter making it up.
Re:Adam
by binarycrusader on Wednesday March 16, 2016 @10:47AM
(#11297731)
Sure, but same info here: http://thenextweb.com/gadgets/2016/03/16/check-amazing-short...
Someone should ask though given another poster's comment below about the GDC demo of the editor where they were using a GTX 980.
Re:Adam
by benjismith on Tuesday March 15, 2016 @10:07PM
(#11294494)
on your hardware!
Nope, that's exactly what it led me to believe, but it is definitely not that.
Re:Adam
by benjismith on Tuesday March 15, 2016 @10:09PM
(#11294499)
Oops. Looks like I was wrong... This is a youtube video of a pre-baked "realtime" render.
Still impressive though...
...on what hardware?