News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Experimental support for WebAssembly in V8 by geon on Tuesday March 15, 2016 @03:37PM (#11292375)
That will soon not be true. Exposing the js gc is on the roadmap.

...which will also make it feasible to use other gc:ed languages without shipping an enormous runtime.

Re:Experimental support for WebAssembly in V8 by RussianCow on Tuesday March 15, 2016 @05:01PM (#11292961)
Okay, but why would you compile JS down to wasm, only to have it then use the browser's built-in JS runtime? I see the use for compiling other dynamic languages, but compiling JS via wasm shouldn't be any different than running it via the normal JS engine, aside from potentially having a slightly smaller executable.
Re:Experimental support for WebAssembly in V8 by tanlermin on Tuesday March 15, 2016 @03:56PM (#11292498)
But they will still need to be interpreted ie cpython.

I'm not sure how much space just cutting out the GC will save?

Re:Experimental support for WebAssembly in V8 by esailija on Tuesday March 15, 2016 @04:20PM (#11292655)
GC is only a small part of a high level language runtime.