Re:Experimental support for WebAssembly in V8
by RussianCow on Tuesday March 15, 2016 @05:01PM
(#11292961)
Okay, but why would you compile JS down to wasm, only to have it then use the browser's built-in JS runtime? I see the use for compiling other dynamic languages, but compiling JS via wasm shouldn't be any different than running it via the normal JS engine, aside from potentially having a slightly smaller executable.
...which will also make it feasible to use other gc:ed languages without shipping an enormous runtime.