News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Experimental support for WebAssembly in V8 by stcredzero on Tuesday March 15, 2016 @01:18PM (#11291241)
A javascript application compiled to wasm doesn't really make sense. Javascript isn't a compiled language.

This compiled/interpreted distinction has gotten quite fuzzy, and it has been for decades now. Smalltalk was always a compiled language with really late binding. It did compile to a bytecode which was interpreted at first, but that became JIT compiled in all but one commercial VM. This all happened over a decade ago.

Also, there is clearly a subset of Javascript programs that could be usefully compiled down to a small, fast, compact machine language program.

Re:Experimental support for WebAssembly in V8 by geon on Tuesday March 15, 2016 @03:34PM (#11292346)
> there is clearly a subset of Javascript

I suppose the extra restrictions of Typescript would help. At least if you add extra restrictions to make it easier to compile.