News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Re: Obama on Fetishizing Our Phones by andrewfromx on Sunday March 13, 2016 @06:37PM (#11279745)
wow, when you put it that way it's like saying "either I have the right to own a gun or I do not." So I guess if people except limits on gun ownership they should accept limits on encryption cuz it's just as dangerous?
Re:Re: Obama on Fetishizing Our Phones by harryh on Sunday March 13, 2016 @06:53PM (#11279811)
Actually no. What I'm saying is that you do have the right to own a gun, but there are limits on gun ownership.

  * Minors cannot buy guns.
  * Convicted felons cannot buy guns in most circumstances.
  * There are numerous locations in which it is illegal to bring a gun.
  * There are numerous types of guns that you are not allowed to own.
It's not binary.
Re:Re: Obama on Fetishizing Our Phones by andrewfromx on Sunday March 13, 2016 @06:45PM (#11279774)
it's that interesting, people on the LEFT want NO LIMITS on encryption but LOTS OF LIMITS on guns. Is encryption more or less dangerous than guns?
Re:Re: Obama on Fetishizing Our Phones by gambiting on Sunday March 13, 2016 @06:42PM (#11279760)
To me personally the concept of even owning a gun is utterly ridiculous, but I guess American people would be incredibly upset if every gun had to come with a built-in remotely controlled switch that could be used by the police to disable it. This is essentially what they are trying to do with encryption - you are free to use it, but we want to be able to manually switch it off if we want to.