News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:AlphaGo beats Lee Sedol 3-0 [video] by argonaut on Saturday March 12, 2016 @08:26AM (#11272756)
Such an entity would not be hyper-intelligent. It would be idiotic. One huge hole for me in the paperclip argument is that an AI capable of that kind of power would not be stupid enough to misinterpret a command - it would be intelligent enough to infer human desires.
Re:AlphaGo beats Lee Sedol 3-0 [video] by sbierwagen on Saturday March 12, 2016 @12:09PM (#11273543)
Yeah, but why would it want to? I can perfectly infer the values of an earthworm, but I don't dedicate all my resources to making worms happy.
Re:AlphaGo beats Lee Sedol 3-0 [video] by technolem on Saturday March 12, 2016 @12:04PM (#11273514)
Of course it would. But, it's not programmed to care about what you meant to say. It will gladly do what it was mis-programmed to do instead. You can already see this kind of trait in humans, where instinct is mis-aligned with intended result. Such as procreation for fun + birth control.
Re:AlphaGo beats Lee Sedol 3-0 [video] by ionforce on Sunday March 13, 2016 @12:49AM (#11276408)
You're making the assumption that human desires would matter to an AI.
Re:AlphaGo beats Lee Sedol 3-0 [video] by anonaoeu on Saturday March 12, 2016 @02:16PM (#11274059)
Sure it would. It just wouldn't be friendly to you.