News for hackers. Stuff that matters.

A comment on State of the Art JavaScript in 2016. Parent comment

Re:State of the Art JavaScript in 2016 by spriggan3 on Saturday March 12, 2016 @02:40AM (#11271746)
Standardization isn't enough. No browser implements ES6 modules thus the webpacks and co.
[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:State of the Art JavaScript in 2016 by yoklov on Saturday March 12, 2016 @07:38AM (#11272609)
How the modules get loaded isn't specified either. All that's specified ATM are the syntax and static semantics. The loader spec probably has to be finished before any browser implements es6 modules.
[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:State of the Art JavaScript in 2016 by javier2 on Saturday March 12, 2016 @01:10PM (#11273802)
And when they do support ES6 modules, I will kick my builder out the door, but until then there is no other way of keeping sane among the thousands of lines of JS.
[ Parent | on HN ]