News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:State of the Art JavaScript in 2016 by bottled_poe on Friday March 11, 2016 @08:52PM (#11270899)
mocha, ava, expect, chai, painless... honestly what the fuck is this. I'm not a javascript developer - is the ecosystem really so fragmented? What a nightmare.
Re:State of the Art JavaScript in 2016 by marcus_holmes on Saturday March 12, 2016 @01:37AM (#11271646)
fragmented, yes, but also amazingly thriving.

There is no one standard choice for anything (except possibly React and Redux as the author says). You get to choose your own stack, how you like it.

Yes, it's more effort to get something you like. But you end up with something you like more.

Re:State of the Art JavaScript in 2016 by natrius on Friday March 11, 2016 @09:36PM (#11271055)
It's not so bad. You just pick the most popular thing or use the recommendations in articles like this one. The ecosystem is harder to dive into than any other language I've used, but you only dive in fresh the first time (or after you've done something else for two years).
Re:State of the Art JavaScript in 2016 by untog on Saturday March 12, 2016 @12:52AM (#11271578)
JavaScript is hardly the only language to have multiple test runners.
Re:State of the Art JavaScript in 2016 by spriggan3 on Saturday March 12, 2016 @02:44AM (#11271754)
chai and expect aren't test runners, just libraries with assert helpers. I personnally stick to jasmine. Chai is what happens when Rubyists try to write some JS like they write some ruby.
Re:State of the Art JavaScript in 2016 by yread on Friday March 11, 2016 @09:32PM (#11271038)
I was kinda hoping it was satire