Many ‘abnormal’ sexual tastes are neither rare nor unusual, study finds

Re:Many ‘abnormal’ sexual tastes are neither rare nor unusua... by tzs on Friday March 11, 2016 @12:36PM (#11268091)

For most of those, D > E, which is what I would expect. There are only two exceptions.

For women E(extended exhibitionism) > D(extended exhibitionism), and for men E(strict exhibitionism) > D(strict exhibitionism).

What are extended exhibitionism and strict exhibitionism, and why do more people experience these than desire to?

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Many ‘abnormal’ sexual tastes are neither rare nor unusua... by justifier on Friday March 11, 2016 @04:05PM (#11269521)

from the paper..

they fail to explicitly define strict, but it is implied from the survey question:

    4. Exhibitionism: “Have you ever been sexually
    aroused by showing your genitals to a stranger who
    was not expecting this?”;

but the paper does explicitly define extended:

    An additional item—“extended exhibitionism (couple)
    which refers to having sex with a partner in front 
    of other people or where you are at risk of being
    seen

so i think you can get from this that strict implies solo, and extended implies multiple participants

which draws a clear line as to why more experience than desire: fulfilling a fantasy of at least one less than the number of the participants

[ Parent | on HN ]