Re:C++17 and other future highlights of C++
by lomnakkus on Friday March 11, 2016 @04:14PM
(#11269575)
Sure, if you ignore statements (from the author!) like:
> Check out the (woefully incomplete) documentation here.
and
> No promise is made about support or long-term stability. This code will evolve without regard to backwards compatibility.
That's not to say I blame him, but you really shouldn't be recommending range-v3 for general use.
Eric Nieblers Range-v3 library is available:
https://github.com/ericniebler/range-v3/
Its not going to be (much) better in the standard...
Except that it would use real concepts then...