Re:One of the FBI’s Major Claims in the iPhone Case Is Fraud...
by boosting6889 on Tuesday March 08, 2016 @07:25PM
(#11249931)
They're not looking to prosecute anyone (defendant is dead), presumably they're trying to recover info the could lead to more terrorists/plots
Re:One of the FBI’s Major Claims in the iPhone Case Is Fraud...
by lswainemoore on Tuesday March 08, 2016 @07:45PM
(#11250027)
Yes, but presumably they might want to bring what they find as evidence in such future cases.
Re:One of the FBI’s Major Claims in the iPhone Case Is Fraud...
by kabdib on Tuesday March 08, 2016 @08:39PM
(#11250254)
Heck, they can just use "parallel construction" and lie their teeth off, as usual.
Re:One of the FBI’s Major Claims in the iPhone Case Is Fraud...
by Spooky23 on Tuesday March 08, 2016 @07:41PM
(#11250013)
The whole point is to build a precedent, remember?
Re:One of the FBI’s Major Claims in the iPhone Case Is Fraud...
by mistercow on Tuesday March 08, 2016 @09:58PM
(#11250587)
You're talking a layer out. This is about what their rationale is.
Re:One of the FBI’s Major Claims in the iPhone Case Is Fraud...
by andromeduck on Tuesday March 08, 2016 @07:39PM
(#11250006)
As if they didn't have enough to convict even he the man wasn't already dead.
If the NSA did this for espionage it's one thing, but I'm curious as to whether substantially modifying the iPhone in this way would stand up in court.... How would the police assert that they preserved evidence after doing this?
I was involved in a drawn out case challenged the validity of data recovered from backup at great. That was easy to assert with normal IT people, and yet it took weeks to litigate. Couldn't imagine how this would go.