News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:C++17 and its Technical Specifications by Rexxar on Thursday March 03, 2016 @06:02PM (#11220749)
The current specification create a "concept" keyword. Why the fully checked concepts couldn't just use another keyword like "checked_concept" that behave exactly like the "concept" keyword for user of the library ? Library implementers can then migrate progressively their code when they can.

edit: or, alternatively, create a "checked_template" keyword when implementing a checked template.

Re:C++17 and its Technical Specifications by moomin on Tuesday March 08, 2016 @05:21PM (#11249260)
In any event, it looks like concepts have indeed been kicked to the kerb. I think the definition checking was important, and some were concerned that there was no library implementation using it, which means they haven't shaken it out in practice yet.