BMW Australia Refusing to Comply with Terms of GNU Public License

Re:BMW Australia Refusing to Comply with Terms of GNU Public... by a3n on Thursday March 03, 2016 @10:55AM (#11217595)

If I understand correctly, all you have to do is add gplCode + yourCode, no modification to gplCode, and that obligates you to a) distribute your source, and b) license your source as gpl.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:BMW Australia Refusing to Comply with Terms of GNU Public... by mh8h on Thursday March 03, 2016 @11:10AM (#11217739)

If you need to link your code against some GPL code, then your code is GPL. But in most cases, a program that runs in a Linux environment doesn't need to link against any GPL libraries.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:BMW Australia Refusing to Comply with Terms of GNU Public... by jamiesonbecker on Thursday March 03, 2016 @11:27AM (#11217875)

Because of this, libraries are frequently licensed under the Lesser GPL instead, which does permit linking without causing the resultant work from becoming GPL'ed itself:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/GNU_Lesser_General_Public_Lice...

As you point out, linking code against GPL'ed code or libraries essentially merges them and makes the end result GPL'ed as well.

[ Parent | on HN ]