News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Nanex Gets $700k Whistleblower Award from SEC by kbenson on Wednesday March 02, 2016 @01:17PM (#11211797)
Can you comment on how hard it was to find another period exhibiting this behavior? The article says We chose this period because there was a noticeable lag in the public quote from the NYSE versus quotes from other exchanges, allowing us to rule out the consolidation process as a source of the delay. Did you have to look for a few periods to see the behavior, or did you look for a few to get a sample that showed the problem more clearly?

Do you have any info on how often lag was present, or how often over a specific threshold?

Do you know how representative you sample was with respect to when lag was present?

I understand you may not have gone into this much detail in your research, but if you have any info like this, I think it helps illustrate the scope of the problem.

Re:Nanex Gets $700k Whistleblower Award from SEC by TheNanex on Wednesday March 02, 2016 @08:02PM (#11214338)
It happens all the time (ALL. THE. TIME.) and have documented dozens of examples. There are links to many of those examples on that page (fantaseconds).

I've also posted many examples on twitter @nanexllc using recent data (yes, this is still a problem!)

Re:Nanex Gets $700k Whistleblower Award from SEC by kdkooo on Wednesday March 02, 2016 @01:24PM (#11211847)
I second that answers to these types of questions would be very helpful! The more context the better.
Re:Nanex Gets $700k Whistleblower Award from SEC by fnordfnordfnord on Wednesday March 02, 2016 @02:56PM (#11212524)