Re:Nanex Gets $700k Whistleblower Award from SEC
by TheNanex on Wednesday March 02, 2016 @08:02PM
(#11214338)
It happens all the time (ALL. THE. TIME.) and have documented dozens of examples. There are links to many of those examples on that page (fantaseconds).
I've also posted many examples on twitter @nanexllc using recent data (yes, this is still a problem!)
Re:Nanex Gets $700k Whistleblower Award from SEC
by kdkooo on Wednesday March 02, 2016 @01:24PM
(#11211847)
I second that answers to these types of questions would be very helpful! The more context the better.
Re:Nanex Gets $700k Whistleblower Award from SEC
by fnordfnordfnord on Wednesday March 02, 2016 @02:56PM
(#11212524)
Do you have any info on how often lag was present, or how often over a specific threshold?
Do you know how representative you sample was with respect to when lag was present?
I understand you may not have gone into this much detail in your research, but if you have any info like this, I think it helps illustrate the scope of the problem.