News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Google says self-driving car hits municipal bus in minor ... by mattzito on Monday February 29, 2016 @01:52PM (#11197286)
> The vehicle and the test driver "believed the bus would slow or allow the Google (autonomous vehicle) to continue."

Clearly the algorithm does not take into account the classic attitudes of bus drivers.

Re:Google says self-driving car hits municipal bus in minor ... by elcapitan on Monday February 29, 2016 @02:09PM (#11197433)
It's probably one of the interesting social outcomes of a mixed self-driving / human-driven traffic that all the assholes will have more opportunities to behave like assholes, because they will be able to rely on the programmed friendlyness of self-driving cars. Eventually, tuning that friendlyness factor will become the new car pimping.
Re:Google says self-driving car hits municipal bus in minor ... by jws on Monday February 29, 2016 @02:17PM (#11197517)
Every time an asshole recklessly endangers the occupants of a self driving car, the car will have recorded the entire event. They should send these to a central clearinghouse and after a certain threshold hand them over to the appropriate prosecutor for charging and conviction. We'll all be safer.

If the asshole can't bring himself to drive civilly, eventually he'll lose his license on points and have to ride around in a self driving car!

Re:Google says self-driving car hits municipal bus in minor ... by djrogers on Monday February 29, 2016 @02:52PM (#11197881)
You essentially want to turn traffic enforcement over to a pervasive surveillance state? Yeah, not a good idea...
Re:Google says self-driving car hits municipal bus in minor ... by mdorazio on Monday February 29, 2016 @03:27PM (#11198175)
No, (s)he wants to turn traffic safety violation reporting over to crowd-sourcing. There is a large difference. I am in favor of the same thing myself since humans drivers prove every day (look at the number of preventable accidents on roads) that they should not be trusted with operating large motor vehicles, especially if alternatives exist in the way of autonomous vehicles. If driving behavior is accountable in the same way as, say, banking transactions, then that seems like a good thing.
Re:Google says self-driving car hits municipal bus in minor ... by jws on Monday February 29, 2016 @03:48PM (#11198358)
ATMs are good comparison. They are left unattended but photo document themselves and their environment. If you attack an ATM it will provide the evidence for a prosecutor to charge you.
Re:Google says self-driving car hits municipal bus in minor ... by Laaw on Monday February 29, 2016 @05:40PM (#11199271)
Yeah, I kind of do. This is not a privacy issue, you're on the road and behaving in a way that's directly endangering me.

You're out in public, operating heavy machinery. Better enforcement of traffic laws would save lives [citation needed].

Re:Google says self-driving car hits municipal bus in minor ... by dahart on Monday February 29, 2016 @08:45PM (#11200265)
I think it'll be great when road ragers can't count on anonymity to protect their reckless, unsafe and illegal habits. Think how pleasant it will be to drive when everyone actually drives safely.

Surveillance state seems like a real stretch in this case. There is no right to privacy when you're driving on public roads, you can now and will continue to be photographed while driving. It's already happening anyway, highways have road cams, people have dash cams. If there's a problem, it's already here.

Re:Google says self-driving car hits municipal bus in minor ... by snuxoll on Monday February 29, 2016 @03:28PM (#11198189)
Same argument that gets made against red-light cameras, if "things" are accusing you of a crime how do you get to face your accuser?
Re:Google says self-driving car hits municipal bus in minor ... by blktiger on Monday February 29, 2016 @02:20PM (#11197553)
This is the most interesting part of this story to me. That the test driver believed the bus would let the vehicle continue indicates to me that the human driver would probably not have done any better than the automated car in this case.
Re:Google says self-driving car hits municipal bus in minor ... by junto on Monday February 29, 2016 @01:56PM (#11197327)
Even more lucky it wasn't a BMW.

Here in Europe the attitudes of BMW drivers are not highly regarded.

Re:Google says self-driving car hits municipal bus in minor ... by gradi3nt on Monday February 29, 2016 @02:00PM (#11197366)
Here in the US we stand with you on the issue of BMW drivers.
Re:Google says self-driving car hits municipal bus in minor ... by mfkp on Monday February 29, 2016 @02:16PM (#11197503)
Not just Europe - BMW drivers are the same around the world.
Re:Google says self-driving car hits municipal bus in minor ... by mrec on Monday February 29, 2016 @02:45PM (#11197805)
Oh yes. Even in Germany. When some nutcase whizzed past you on the autobahn doing 200kph, it was pretty much always a BMW.
Re:Google says self-driving car hits municipal bus in minor ... by bsder on Monday February 29, 2016 @03:21PM (#11198116)
My standard comment to a new BMW owner: "So, do you have to prove you are an asshole to buy a BMW, or do they force you to take a class after you buy one?"
Re:Google says self-driving car hits municipal bus in minor ... by johansch on Monday February 29, 2016 @02:04PM (#11197390)
Not even in Germany?
Re:Google says self-driving car hits municipal bus in minor ... by aluhut on Monday February 29, 2016 @02:09PM (#11197429)
This is their lair. They are the worst here.
Re:Google says self-driving car hits municipal bus in minor ... by johansch on Monday February 29, 2016 @02:29PM (#11197640)
What is the German ranking in terms of obnoxiousness like?

E.g. based on BMW, Porsche, Audi, Mercedes-Benz, Volkswagen, Opel, <foreign invaders>?

Re:Google says self-driving car hits municipal bus in minor ... by junto on Monday February 29, 2016 @02:50PM (#11197867)
Pretty much that exact order.
Re:Google says self-driving car hits municipal bus in minor ... by pgeorgi on Monday February 29, 2016 @06:27PM (#11199598)
I'd rank Mercedes higher. They even install a cross-hair for better targetting.
Re:Google says self-driving car hits municipal bus in minor ... by johansch on Monday February 29, 2016 @03:36PM (#11198258)
I would guess Mercedes owners would be more obnoxious than Audi owners though? :)
Re:Google says self-driving car hits municipal bus in minor ... by aluhut on Tuesday March 01, 2016 @01:22AM (#11201070)
Mercedes are a special problem. Often driven by older male drivers who sometimes remember that their car can drive fast but not caring most of the time. Even while on the left lane.
Re:Google says self-driving car hits municipal bus in minor ... by lamontcg on Monday February 29, 2016 @04:09PM (#11198529)
Not around here... Lexus and Escalades beat out Mercedes. I haven't seen a lot of difference between BMWs and Audi drivers either.
Re:Google says self-driving car hits municipal bus in minor ... by thesimon on Monday February 29, 2016 @03:04PM (#11197979)
It feels like BMW, Porsche, Audi and then the rest
Re:Google says self-driving car hits municipal bus in minor ... by chefkoch on Monday February 29, 2016 @02:08PM (#11197421)
Depends on the model / style and how old it is.
Re:Google says self-driving car hits municipal bus in minor ... by johansch on Monday February 29, 2016 @02:31PM (#11197664)
I guess old BMW's get more cred, while with newer ones you swear "tax evader" under you breath as it overtakes you in the left lane?
Re:Google says self-driving car hits municipal bus in minor ... by seanp2k2 on Monday February 29, 2016 @02:08PM (#11197419)
They should invite a bunch of Prius drivers to MV to "test" with the self-driving cars on the road with them "driving normally". I'm sure they'd get some great test data out of it and help prevent lots of future incidents :)