News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Ground control bids farewell to Philae comet lander by ars on Sunday February 28, 2016 @03:44PM (#11192278)
> such as a road accident

No, not really. They are pretty safe - you can hold one in your hand without a problem (barring a burn - they get hot).

A road accident would do nothing harmful at all.

> having it be stolen

That strikes me as pretty unlikely - they don't exactly drive on public roads.

Re:Ground control bids farewell to Philae comet lander by barkingcat on Sunday February 28, 2016 @04:38PM (#11192499)
Nuclear missiles, fissile material, reactor cores, etc are transported on public roads - where else would they go? We haven't invented transporters yet so transportation is still roads, rail, sea, air - these things don't just magically appear at the launch site or at the power station. Someone needed to drive the semi that gets it there.

There is absolutely a chance of fissile materials being stolen in transport - that's why there's multiple levels of security and multilateral treaties with most countries around the world about this kind of issue.

http://www.patriotnetdaily.com/wp-content/uploads/2015/11/Nu...

Re:Ground control bids farewell to Philae comet lander by ars on Sunday February 28, 2016 @10:27PM (#11193443)
I meant the road from the assembly plant to the launch platform.
Re:Ground control bids farewell to Philae comet lander by funkyy on Sunday February 28, 2016 @06:15PM (#11192851)
Add special forces to the transport, a lot of it, and problem solved.
Re:Ground control bids farewell to Philae comet lander by saboot on Sunday February 28, 2016 @03:57PM (#11192340)
We drive nuclear missiles on public roads, with enough security anything is doable.
Re:Ground control bids farewell to Philae comet lander by eco on Sunday February 28, 2016 @07:01PM (#11193001)