Re:Microsoft, Google, Facebook Back Apple in Blocked Phone Case
by criddell on Friday February 26, 2016 @07:44PM
(#11185450)
I think it was classified as a munition for practical reasons - they wanted export controls.
I think it's great that you name specific parts of the government because not all parts of the government think strong encryption is a problem.
Re:Microsoft, Google, Facebook Back Apple in Blocked Phone Case
by progressive_dad on Friday February 26, 2016 @09:01PM
(#11185691)
All I'm concerned about is a bottle. Take a little walk to the edge of town across the track. Where the viaduct looms as it shifts and cracks. Where the border lies. Across the stack. On a gathering storm comes a handsome man with a red right hand.
4PM in Chicago. I'm out of here.
Its easy to see why DOD originally classified it as a munition. Video games have become a powerful tool for storytelling, education, performance art, and immersive experiences for a long time but they started out as artillery simulators and a means to practice war games. That mentality pervades and we still see Jump, Shoot, and Run as the primary dynamic by which we function in these amazing experiences. You're fighting against human instinct and hundreds of thousands of years of evolution. Against Dunbar's number, the core mechanic of trust and social engagement for millenia. I hope you're right, but I don't think it will be the sea-change you're expecting. Look at the adoption of bitcoin and remember that law enforcement is a retro-grade function of society. Underfunded and always behind the zeitgeist.
We don't ask the secret service to build the president's merchandising website, and we shouldn't expect the FBI to be able to articulate or comprehend the, "triviality" of undermining strong encryption.