News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Acceptable Ads explained: monetization by x0x0 on Friday February 26, 2016 @01:49PM (#11183177)
They carefully elide one of the most important criteria: pay eyeo.
Re:Acceptable Ads explained: monetization by LeeHarveysGrave on Friday February 26, 2016 @02:04PM (#11183289)
No kidding, nor do they explain that ad agencies have little to no interest in selling their clients this 'acceptable experience'.

Nor do large brands have any interest in promoting expensively created brands with sub-par adverts.

Truth be told they're after a slice of the remnant and low rent market so they're effectively extorting the small and medium businesses, "mom and pop" outfits, folks that use adwords and similar to build their brands.

Extorting publishers and telling them to pay to advertise on their own content is pretty cheeky.

Re:Acceptable Ads explained: monetization by thecolorblue on Friday February 26, 2016 @02:38PM (#11183564)
I would second this.

Is there any data out there on ad placement effectiveness? It sounds like they are removing the ads that are actually effective and leaving the ads nobody notices, in other words, the ads that nobody would pay for.

As someone who used to work for a SaaS company, it always amazed me how many people expect to get things for free.

Re:Acceptable Ads explained: monetization by tomjen3 on Friday February 26, 2016 @05:51PM (#11184895)
I can't remember the last time a promoted tweet was relevant for me. I am not going to buy Samsungs new super expensive phone, I am not going to be using mail-chimp.

So why do I keep seeing ads for crap I don't need and products I already know about, instead of new products that are useful that I can actually use? Maybe if ads were useful people would want to see them and so they wouldn't have to be annoying.

Re:Acceptable Ads explained: monetization by thecolorblue on Saturday February 27, 2016 @11:54AM (#11187605)
That is a good point, relevant ads are less annoying. Are you fine with ad companies collecting information about you to give you better targeted ads?
Re:Acceptable Ads explained: monetization by charonn0 on Friday February 26, 2016 @02:40PM (#11183588)
> ad agencies have little to no interest in selling their clients this 'acceptable experience'. Nor do large brands have any interest in promoting expensively created brands with sub-par adverts.

And users are clearly not interested in seeing their ads in the first place.

Re:Acceptable Ads explained: monetization by LeeHarveysGrave on Monday February 29, 2016 @02:34PM (#11197690)
Exactly.

So let's stop the pretense that acceptable advertising is meaningful.

Re:Acceptable Ads explained: monetization by dredmorbius on Friday February 26, 2016 @03:08PM (#11183848)
A weak pun on "payola"?
Re:Acceptable Ads explained: monetization by x0x0 on Friday February 26, 2016 @05:28PM (#11184773)
I wish I were that witty =P
Re:Acceptable Ads explained: monetization by teach on Friday February 26, 2016 @01:54PM (#11183215)
What?
Re:Acceptable Ads explained: monetization by nugget on Friday February 26, 2016 @01:56PM (#11183225)
I think he means that the acceptable ads program is just extortion with a shiny fake narrative on top. Which seems pretty obvious to me.
Re:Acceptable Ads explained: monetization by x0x0 on Friday February 26, 2016 @01:59PM (#11183252)
a 30% rev share if you have over 10mm pv / month

for them to maintain a hashmap with your url in it

Re:Acceptable Ads explained: monetization by ljk on Friday February 26, 2016 @03:00PM (#11183764)