News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:“Super Engine” may fundamentally change the way internal ... by dredmorbius on Friday February 26, 2016 @12:53AM (#11180010)
Fuel cells:

1. Run silently or near silently. They're generating electricity via redox reactions, not combusting.

2. Have effectively no moving parts. Again, no noise or vibration.

3. Product electricity directly. For powering electronics, this means no secondary generation required.

4. Utilise extremely expensive catalysts. The reason you don't see fuel-cell automobiles (excluding very small numbers of test vehicles) is that the engines cost, literally, on the order of $1 million, as opposed to a few hundred for a typical ICE. This price premium has proven difficult to overcome.

5. Operate better delivering fairly steady-state power, from what I understand. A tremendous benefit of ICEs is that they can scale output in a second or few seconds, with very little throttle lag. Yes, straight-up electric motors are even better at this, but straight-up batteries tend to not store much power.

A fuel cell is essentially a battery whose electrolytes you fill rather than recharge or replace. This offers the advantages of fuel-based systems (high energy capacity) and batteries (direct electrical output). Unfortunately, it introduces the disadvantages of fuel cells (cost, power delivery profile).

Re:“Super Engine” may fundamentally change the way internal ... by eru on Friday February 26, 2016 @07:35AM (#11181044)
I was thinking of hydrocarbon fuel cells (hydrocarbons in, CO2, water, useful energy and heat out). In any case, I agree with your analysis.
Re:“Super Engine” may fundamentally change the way internal ... by dredmorbius on Friday February 26, 2016 @02:14PM (#11183362)
Yes, that's one option. I'm a little shakey on the specific function, characteristics, and reaction materials, but some form of redox and electron flow is what you're aiming for.