I don't have any interesting answers for your hiring filters.
The culture you've built is very rare. I realized that if I felt that way, then I should try to help it become the norm.
We take all applications seriously but if you feel you got rejected for a bad reason feel free to contact me directly.
I guess you meant to paste: https://about.gitlab.com/jobs/
"A note on the technical interview: As part of our interviewing process, you may be asked to pick an issue from the GitLab CE issue tracker, and code ‘live’ with the interviewer there to talk with and collaborate with. We do this because we believe that it is the best way for you to see what the work is really like, and for our interviewer to see how you think, code, and collaborate." Actually, it's the opposite of how to find out how I think and code.
Do you have a profile on GitLab.com, GitHub or Bitbucket?
No.
What (open source) project that you built or contributed to are you particularly proud of / passionate about?
None.
Were you referred by a current GitLab team member?
No.
I once discovered that one of the most effective developers in the world would've had similar answers.
I know it's just an errant downvote, and people can feel however they want. But the information is no longer useful.
Assessing a candidate is as simple (and as hard) as that. Watching someone while they code isn't useful. https://data.triplebyte.com/take-home-interviews-d7f7ea13067...
Just give me something real to work on.
I created an issue at https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab-ce/issues/13239.
* Increase the prominence of gitlab hosted projects on about.gitlab. Project search, trending, curated lists. - https://gitlab.com/gitlab-com/www-gitlab-com/issues/558
* Trending project data by language (js, ruby etc) - https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab-ce/issues/13475
* Allow projects to flag themselves as looking for contributors - https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab-ce/issues/13502
Give them a +1 maybe they will put resources on making gitlab more oss friendly
gitlab.com is the public 'demo' version which people compare to github. It's missing a few key items that would make it appealing to open source developers (and that I'd like to see them prioritize.) E.g.:
* Site search. It's been broken for months or possibly years. (Response time > 45 secs., Relevancy is miscalculated: "gitlab" itself does not appear in the search results.)
* Repo / project discovery and social features are extremely primitive.