News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Bernie’s Army of Coders by SilasX on Thursday February 18, 2016 @08:31PM (#11130884)
Thanks for joining the discussion!

I understand that it's a non-monetary contribution; my confusion is just on why we should treat them differently from monetary and why people think of them differently, even when they accomplish the same thing (deliver $X worth of value to a campaign), especially given that, for a foreigner to contribute money is a serious crime.

(Less of an issue in your case since you're not some random Chinese government official but an actual US resident with legal status who can stay.)

Re:Bernie’s Army of Coders by rapicastillo on Friday February 19, 2016 @12:56AM (#11131886)
That's a great thing to think about. IMHO, it's about worth and intent - as with any. And as with any software development, it's all relative. For me - personally - coding the map was a way for me to practice leaflet, which I've always been interested in learning, and at the same time D3. I never really thought about or even expected the campaign reaching out to me. The original map which is in bernie2016events.org used to take events from meetup.com and facebook.com, which I have scraped and manually curated. The campaign's open API for the events happened later.

So for me, the map was a practice exercise, which is essentially like a more convoluted Hello World. The value was perceived by others, and the campaign. The value for me was, "Ok, there's cluttered events all around the wild, I'd like to make sense of it and help out while I practice D3 and Leaflet."

The value as perceived by others was beyond me, and I was really just happy that it had bigger value that I originally intended.

This is different with foreign governments contributing online assets or money to the campaign, because the intent is different, and the worth is different. The intent is influence/leverage, and worth is tools/dollars. And as you have predicated below as well, corporate money is very different if you look deeper, compared to an individual who's just practicing.

Re:Bernie’s Army of Coders by stephenboyd on Friday February 19, 2016 @01:11AM (#11131926)
Rapi, as a permanent resident, you are legally American enough to donate money to a campaign.

http://www.fec.gov/ans/answers_general.shtml#Can_nonUS_citiz...

Re:Bernie’s Army of Coders by rapicastillo on Friday February 19, 2016 @01:20AM (#11131950)
Yes, I understand. But I thought I'd put my 2cents on the difference between what I did if I didn't have a green card. And how it differs with a corporation/big donors/super PACs or a foreign gov't giving assistance to a campaign.
Re:Bernie’s Army of Coders by stephenboyd on Friday February 19, 2016 @01:03AM (#11131905)
Except for actually voting and running for elected office themselves, the laws for permanent residents in the political process are the same as for citizens. So in this case, it's not a question of non-monetary versus monetary contributions—Rapi can also legally write a check to the Sanders campaign because he is legally an American national. Getting the green card is the point when someone is no longer considered a foreign national.

I personally participated in the 2008 Democratic caucus as a permanent resident. I could take part in the political discussions, but I just couldn't vote (which is a party rule, not a law). I also lobbied state legislators on behalf of the school I was attending.

http://www.fec.gov/ans/answers_general.shtml#Can_nonUS_citiz...