Re:Technical interview performance is kind of arbitrary
by stale2002 on Wednesday February 17, 2016 @03:54PM
(#11121291)
Ever thought about releasing this study guide that you've made? I would love to take a look at it/ send it to some friends!
Re:Technical interview performance is kind of arbitrary
by iolothebard on Thursday February 18, 2016 @11:57AM
(#11127150)
Lol, no. It's mostly just an amalgamation of all the technologies and stupid fucking interview questions that you get.
I have 10-12 different documents. CS/OO (basics for reminders with some simple algorithms), .Net, SQL (I always forget this shit, it's why I have data layer and use ORMs + LINQ), LINQ, jQuery, Vanilla JS, HTML5+CSS, Architecture/Patterns, ASP.Net vs MVC, Tuning, etc.
Haven't updated them in a few years because I left the bubble. My interviews in the midwest are typically an hour or two at most with very little quizzing. At worst they ask you to make them a small simple app (which I find irritating but better than SF interviews).
The best part though was realizing if you didn't answer that one question exactly how the "brilliant" person interviewing you wanted it answered, you were done. So at that point I'd quiz them on all their shortcomings that were evident based on what they'd told me.
In my experience hiring it's not that difficult. Good attitude, good aptitude, genuine interest in the field (software engineering), ideally interest in the applied product (if not a software product), decent communicator and good hygiene. If they've done well in those areas, I've never had to let someone go.