Re:A Message to Our Customers
by e_modad on Wednesday February 17, 2016 @04:08AM
(#11116410)
The major difference is that a warrant to access a safety deposit box allows the keys for that specific safety deposit box and no other. What the FBI is asking for is the equivalent of asking for a master key to all the safety deposit boxes to access just the one box. Given what was revealed in the summer of 2013 by Snowden, I think we'd all agree that the FBI and other state agencies (not just American agencies) will use the software as a backdoor to access whichever iPhone they choose. Let's not be naive.
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:A Message to Our Customers
by planetjones on Wednesday February 17, 2016 @04:11AM
(#11116422)
Well the FBI would have to have the iPhone in their possession to unlock it I presume. SO that's one level of security - I don't think the USA has become a place where property can just be confiscated without reason (I hope I am right here). If Apple were custodians of the unlock process then only once due legal process had been followed would an iPhone be unlocked i.e. Apple would own the unlocking mechanism. Maybe in the CEOs safe...
Re:A Message to Our Customers
by intopieces on Wednesday February 17, 2016 @04:15AM
(#11116450)
> I don't think the USA has become a place where property can just be confiscated without reason
Civil Forefeiture has been a problem for a long time.
Re:A Message to Our Customers
by robbiet480 on Wednesday February 17, 2016 @04:33AM
(#11116547)
Does Apple really have to create a "master" key though? Couldn't Apple write the backdoor that would only activates on the iPhone in question? Even if it was something as simple as "if (secure_id == terrorist_phone_id) [accept any pin]", it's not like the FBI could remove the condition without invalidating the signature. If they could, they wouldn't need Apple's help to begin with.