Re:If you're going to do good science, release the computer ...
by btilly on Monday February 08, 2010 @01:24PM
(#1110288)
The solution is to make peer reviewed code produced for a paper be considered equivalent to a paper in tenure decisions. And for all papers in peer reviewed journals that do computer analysis to be backed up by peer reviewed, published code.
That makes code development beneficial for your career, gives an incentive to not keep it under wraps, improves quality, and is likely to reduce the number of published incorrect results.
Of course that is a pipe dream at this point, but what's wrong with dreaming?
Though it's hard to find a situation where people don't have a (short-term) incentive to make their work look good. One can hope it will catch up with them in the long run, but more likely by then they have a new job (and, in academics, tenure) that will never hear about their past shoddy work.