Re:Why GNU Emacs?
by pjmlp on Sunday February 14, 2016 @06:13PM
(#11100461)
Which of them is certified as such?
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Who really cares about whether something is "certified" UNIX? Certification is not some seal of quality. "Unix" is commonly understood to denote "functional" unix systems as well for lack of a more convenient term.
That os what the UNIX-like expression is for.
OS X would have been the only one certified. Even then I wouldn't call it a BSD per-se.
Re:Why GNU Emacs?
by groovy2shoes on Sunday February 14, 2016 @06:20PM
(#11100494)
Oh, didn't realize you meant only certified Unices. I'll be on my way...