For example, even if this neanderthal gene happens to causally affect depression by 1%, that pathway might be something like
gene => slightly wider shoulders => that body structure is slightly more or less likely to lead to certain life outcomes, like marrying early or getting promoted or getting targeted by pickpockets => change in depression risk
As a result, the gene might currently lead to a 1% increase in depression risk, but in a few years it might do the opposite, if things change in the surrounding culture and those intermediary steps behave a little differently.
Here's one article (and there are a great many more) describing such a finding: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3923972/
"Long-term depression" (LTD) has absolutely nothing to do with "depression". LTD is a mechanism of synaptic plasticity, where the strength of the synapse is reduced ("depressed").
I'm a neuroscientist, and I checked ref 5.
That seems like noise to me. Especially in such a large study that attempted to cross-correlate (apparently) hundreds of factors, I would require a lot more evidence not to discard this as the jelly bean effect (https://xkcd.com/882/).
Now I haven't read the paper, but based on this article, I dare say it would be irresponsible to label this a finding.