News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:The Schism Over Bitcoin Is How Bitcoin Is Supposed to Work by zekevermillion on Friday February 12, 2016 @11:49AM (#11088511)
There is no ruler. The user can choose the software to run. It's possible there will be multiple protocols that claim to be Bitcoin. It would be nice if some general consensus emerged not to use the Bitcoin name for specifications that introduce substantial changes to the underlying economics or reward structure of the protocol. But even if there's no consensus on semantics, each group can choose to ignore the other and the only consequence will be that I have to check who is speaking before I conclude they mean the same thing I do when I say "Bitcoin".
Re:The Schism Over Bitcoin Is How Bitcoin Is Supposed to Work by bdamm on Friday February 12, 2016 @01:09PM (#11089112)
There can only be one blockchain though. As far as I know, any long standing blockchain has a unique name.
Re:The Schism Over Bitcoin Is How Bitcoin Is Supposed to Work by zekevermillion on Friday February 12, 2016 @03:27PM (#11090273)
If you hard-fork the Bitcoin blockchain, but users continue to run implementations of both, then you have two separate blockchains that are both called "Bitcoin". We could call one of these "XT" or "Bitcoin Prime" I suppose.