Re:Summarizing Data in SQL
by jmsmistral on Sunday February 07, 2016 @06:12AM
(#11052518)
I think ">128TB" is stretching the upper-limit for single-node database. When you're dealing with > 10TB in a single node, it's probably wise to 'shard' or partition the data over more than one node (think backups/archiving, query performance,...).
To answer the initial question - take a look at CitusDB that runs over PostgreSQL. They seem to be doing some cool work in real-time analytics/scalability: https://www.citusdata.com/
To answer the initial question - take a look at CitusDB that runs over PostgreSQL. They seem to be doing some cool work in real-time analytics/scalability: https://www.citusdata.com/