News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:LinkedIn shares drop 40%, erasing $10B of company's value by astazangasta on Saturday February 06, 2016 @10:33AM (#11048111)
Common sense? Median rents are $5500 a month. No one can afford that. A city can't exist if people can't live there.
Re:LinkedIn shares drop 40%, erasing $10B of company's value by refurb on Saturday February 06, 2016 @11:56AM (#11048485)
Don't forget that the median rent is determined by the very small slice of rentals that are changing hands.

I'd love to know what the median rent across all rentals is in SF! ~70% are rent controlled. I'd guess the median rent is maybe half? Around $2000? Just a guess.

Re:LinkedIn shares drop 40%, erasing $10B of company's value by steven2012 on Saturday February 06, 2016 @10:48AM (#11048166)
You say no one can afford it, but all the apartments are rented out.
Re:LinkedIn shares drop 40%, erasing $10B of company's value by astazangasta on Saturday February 06, 2016 @11:17AM (#11048280)
Sure, but that class of people can't do all the things required to run the city (food service, child care, etc). Those people have been priced out and are moving elsewhere. The city suffers; it becomes difficult to sustain the current pattern.
Re:LinkedIn shares drop 40%, erasing $10B of company's value by brianwawok on Saturday February 06, 2016 @10:37PM (#11051476)
I mean other cities are like this too. Chicago is a very cheap big city. But how many server workers live in Gold Coast or River North? The difference is I guess cheap housing is closer compared to SF?
Re:LinkedIn shares drop 40%, erasing $10B of company's value by steven2012 on Saturday February 06, 2016 @02:02PM (#11049167)
Except none of the doomsday predictions have come true. There are still of services like food service, child care, etc.