News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Watson for President by privong on Saturday February 06, 2016 @07:37AM (#11047523)
> Would you have the same qualms if the AI's source were open and the public voted on which pull requests to accept?

I interpreted @mtgx's statement as referring to the information that would be input into the IA. Namely that if presidents are getting bad advice from advisors already, replacing the president with an AI might not improve things, if the same bad advice is still being fed in.

Re:Watson for President by babbish on Saturday February 06, 2016 @07:56AM (#11047578)
If that's what he said, then I agree wholeheartedly. "Garbage in, garbage out" is pretty hard to argue against.