News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:LinkedIn shares drop 40%, erasing $10B of company's value by codesushi42 on Saturday February 06, 2016 @02:23AM (#11046905)
> The number of people employed might.

It will.

> Engineer salaries are not going to drop a whole lot.

Basic economics say that will follow.

None of these events are isolated. They're interconnected and cascade. Everyone will be affected, even those who are flipping burgers in the Bay Area.

Re:LinkedIn shares drop 40%, erasing $10B of company's value by LoSboccacc on Saturday February 06, 2016 @02:37AM (#11046927)
> Everyone will be affected, even those who are flipping burgers in the Bay Area.

hey sure there is a bubble there, but last time I checked BA wasn't caput mundi yet. Plenty non inflated startups do exist, even if not specifically there.

Where the whole economy is sustained by VC money, well, there's gonna hit the hardest. But doesn't seem that the whole IT world is following that model.

Re:LinkedIn shares drop 40%, erasing $10B of company's value by codesushi42 on Saturday February 06, 2016 @02:46AM (#11046942)
That doesn't matter in the short term. Once the inflated startups tank, everything will take a dive. Remember 2000?

Maybe not. Seems like many here are too young. I'm only in my early 30s and am already feeling deja vu. Life is strange.

Re:LinkedIn shares drop 40%, erasing $10B of company's value by alexqgb on Monday February 08, 2016 @12:53AM (#11056550)
When the dot.com economy crashed, Google and Apple weren't producing billions in quarterly profits. Facebook didn't even exist. Today, the local economy is a very different thing. There's a new layer of massive and massively profitable companies that are not relying on venture money to keep their doors open. Meanwhile, a number of truly fundamental breakthroughs in AI, A/VR, genetics (CRISPR), transportation, and energy are happening simultaneously. Any one of them could trigger another tech boom, especially when corporate balance sheets have ludicrous amounts of liquidity. All five at once indicates a world-historical event in the making (think Second Industrial Revolution).

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Second_Industrial_Revolution

Accordingly, there's no reason to be investing in fluff like file sharing, app-based bike delivery, or "valuable" services like Shazam when there's real work to be done. In other words, the VC correction unfolding now is exactly that, a correction (long overdue, to my mind, and an unambiguously healthy thing). It will hurt a lot of overextended people to be sure, and unprofitable companies with dubious valuations that are laying people off now are wise to get ahead of the crunch.

As the squeeze tightens, salaries will even out, the balance of power will shift to employers, traffic may improve (slightly), and rents may even stop climbing. But 20-30% declines in the overall housing market? Dream on. Prices here are a function of a massive shortage, off-the-charts desirability, and deeply-rooted peculiarities in the tax code (Prop. 13), not Florida-style speculation. All of these factors are far more impervious to temporary downturns in the employment market.

Having lived through the dot.com crash, I can certainly hear echoes, but deja vu it isn't. The world is now a very different place.

Re:LinkedIn shares drop 40%, erasing $10B of company's value by dev360 on Saturday February 06, 2016 @10:02AM (#11047981)
I recall sending my resume to over 50-60 companies for junior web dev work @ $15/hr after college and only getting two answers back. It was pretty brutal.
Re:LinkedIn shares drop 40%, erasing $10B of company's value by weeksie on Saturday February 06, 2016 @02:53AM (#11046949)
Actually, basic economics says that wages tend to be sticky.
Re:LinkedIn shares drop 40%, erasing $10B of company's value by codesushi42 on Saturday February 06, 2016 @03:12AM (#11046980)
/Average wages/. On a macro scale.

That's not the same situation. Of course you're going to see the $150-200k premium for engineers fall once startups, funding, and jobs disappear. It's already happening in the form of cutting RSUs and bonus packages.

And it has happened before. Why is it so hard to understand this?

Re:LinkedIn shares drop 40%, erasing $10B of company's value by weeksie on Saturday February 06, 2016 @04:16AM (#11047089)
Oh, I was around.

Regardless, I was stating that your dismissal of "basic economics" was wrong. It's not basic economics, there's a lot that goes into the equation. Wages might go down. Wages might not go down by a ton. They might drop like a rock. It all depends on a number of factors, but blithely dismissing people with some nonesense about econ 101 is not being intellectually honest.

Re:LinkedIn shares drop 40%, erasing $10B of company's value by codesushi42 on Saturday February 06, 2016 @04:36AM (#11047131)
You're still talking macro 101. I'm not talking about nationwide unemployment figures here.

The key is that wages for /engineers/ will fall if funding and jobs disappear in the tech sector. Today's wages for engineers are high and will be unsustainable when things go bust.

How much they will fall is anyone's guess. But the reasoning behind why they will fall is very straightforward.

Re:LinkedIn shares drop 40%, erasing $10B of company's value by ownagefool on Saturday February 06, 2016 @09:04AM (#11047774)
Wages probably will fall but it's probably also more complex than that.

Your extremely talented engineers who build things at scale and understand the fundementals, who are basically a safe per of hands, are still going to be in deep demand. Profitiable companies that work at scale are still going to have real problems and are unlikely to turn around and tell their engineers that they're going to be getting significantly less money, as those engineers are already in their own market and these companies will still want to compete for them.

The startups filled with architecture astronauts who spend most of their time overdesigning, learning new tools, and basically doing anything that isn't meeting user needs, delivering the product or tackling some tough engineering problem, then you're likely going to see a drop because they're not really worth it in the first place.

Re:LinkedIn shares drop 40%, erasing $10B of company's value by doktrin on Saturday February 06, 2016 @04:28PM (#11049978)
This strikes me as a bit of a fantasy. Very few people can recognize, and even fewer value, a "safe pair of hands". Let's not also forget this industry's rampant ageism, which even in good times sidelines experience in favor of hipness. I have no idea why you think this will magically change just because times are tough.
Re:LinkedIn shares drop 40%, erasing $10B of company's value by ownagefool on Sunday February 07, 2016 @06:51AM (#11052572)
I'm not sure the industry suffers from ageism in the way most people here think it does. The start-up community hiring cocky 24 year old team leads who refuse to heed advice from their seniors definitely aren't going to be hiring the older guy, sure.

However, remove the funding and force these companies to actually compete on merit and only those who are actually capable of delivering will still exist. At that point, hopefully, we'll see a rise of new leaders who actally value excellence.

The point is, we can only afford to value hipness over experience in bubbles and it looks like this one's about to burst. Of course, I'm not from the future, so I could be wrong.

Re:LinkedIn shares drop 40%, erasing $10B of company's value by RhodesianHunter on Saturday February 06, 2016 @01:04PM (#11048841)
Most management can't tell the difference between the two.
Re:LinkedIn shares drop 40%, erasing $10B of company's value by ownagefool on Saturday February 06, 2016 @01:34PM (#11049022)
True, but you're assuming they won't be part of the same cull.
Re:LinkedIn shares drop 40%, erasing $10B of company's value by toomuchtodo on Saturday February 06, 2016 @11:43PM (#11051642)
Culls occur from the bottom up. Engineers, then management.
Re:LinkedIn shares drop 40%, erasing $10B of company's value by nikdaheratik on Monday February 08, 2016 @01:29AM (#11056646)
I disagree completely. I think there are really two markets for dev jobs: the startup economy which is over-inflated but also exists in a smaller high COL location, and everyone else which had lower COL and wages to begin with and likely won't see much of a drop in wages due to the fact that their company needs those services to function efficiently.

You can argue that the drop in employment in startup land may see some movement outside the bay area and into boring lower paid dev jobs, but I doubt that it will be more than a small blip.

TL;DR: If you're at a start up the good times might be over. If you're not, don't expect much change (maybe less likely to see a pay rise). If you're just coming out of Uni and into the job market, you may see interesting times.

Re:LinkedIn shares drop 40%, erasing $10B of company's value by toomuchtodo on Saturday February 06, 2016 @03:40AM (#11047030)
Because most people here weren't around for 1999-2001.
Re:LinkedIn shares drop 40%, erasing $10B of company's value by codesushi42 on Saturday February 06, 2016 @03:50AM (#11047042)
Agreed. But I'm still a little surprised by this. I would expect anyone at least 30 yro to have /some/ recollection of what happened, if not a good understanding. Or to have the curiosity to find out what did. I'm 31 myself, but knew what was happening with the bubble during highschool (thanks pud and F'd company).

Maybe the typical age on HN is 21? :)

Re:LinkedIn shares drop 40%, erasing $10B of company's value by gaius on Saturday February 06, 2016 @08:33AM (#11047690)
Young people are just smarter, apparently. Sit back and enjoy the show.
Re:LinkedIn shares drop 40%, erasing $10B of company's value by majani on Saturday February 06, 2016 @10:17AM (#11048044)
Yup. Most guys here are in their 20s: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=5536734
Re:LinkedIn shares drop 40%, erasing $10B of company's value by dilemma on Saturday February 06, 2016 @03:08AM (#11046969)
And as a result, unemployment higher.