News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:LinkedIn shares drop 40%, erasing $10B of company's value by twblalock on Friday February 05, 2016 @04:27PM (#11044772)
Two engineers with average compensation could split at apartment at that price, and many do. So do married couples with dual incomes.
Re:LinkedIn shares drop 40%, erasing $10B of company's value by nly on Friday February 05, 2016 @06:50PM (#11045620)
Yeah, at the cost of increased volatility. If two engineers, each with a 10% chance of losing their job in the next 2 years, do this then they both are much more likely (19% chance) to face uncertainty in that time.
Re:LinkedIn shares drop 40%, erasing $10B of company's value by calinet6 on Friday February 05, 2016 @11:03PM (#11046498)
They're all young. They don't think like that.
Re:LinkedIn shares drop 40%, erasing $10B of company's value by alanh on Friday February 05, 2016 @05:26PM (#11045126)
You may be missing the point. Say most tech engineers double up (as if they aren’t often doing this already). Guess what? You just significantly reduced demand for high-rent apartments
Re:LinkedIn shares drop 40%, erasing $10B of company's value by nascentmind on Saturday February 06, 2016 @06:09AM (#11047270)
Renters will increase the price knowing full well that people will double up. Also if the renters are ruthless they would directly tell you to have more people packed in an apartment to pay their price and if people are helpless they would have to cough up or find some other job in another state where you can live decently with lesser pay. Also a lot of shitty apartments will increase their rents which puts more pressure. This I feel is simple price discovery at work. This is why it is better for the company to spread itself in different places rather than hole up in a single place and pay very salaries which are not sustainable. I really don't understand start ups which are supposed to be tight on cash sitting on one of the costliest real estate and expect to be profitable.