Re:ZCash (formerly Zerocash/Zerocoin) technology preview
by grubles on Friday February 05, 2016 @05:00PM
(#11044976)
So, what is to stop someone from forking the code and removing the percentages that go to the Zcash company and devs? Similar to how Monero was forked from Bytecoin due to some odd shadiness (not that I think Zcash and co. are shady!) [0].
Re:ZCash (formerly Zerocash/Zerocoin) technology preview
by bb88 on Friday February 05, 2016 @02:30PM
(#11043950)
From that link I see this:
> With this approach, the founders are incentivized to support Zcash for the long haul (at least for four years), and they have limited ability to pump-and-dump.
I don't see how anyone can audit that statement since the transactions are encrypted [1].
Re:ZCash (formerly Zerocash/Zerocoin) technology preview
by jacobr1 on Friday February 05, 2016 @04:24PM
(#11044749)
> I don't see how anyone can audit that statement since the transactions are encrypted
Couldn't one audit the code? Provided zcash itself doesn't have 51% or more of the mining network post launch the open source code should be verifiable and needs to have some special case to route the "founder reward". Though I admit I haven't looked through the source code so I may be missing something.
Re:ZCash (formerly Zerocash/Zerocoin) technology preview
by davidsarah on Thursday February 11, 2016 @05:33AM
(#11079355)
Mining rewards, and the proportion of them that goes to the Zcash company, are transparent (not encrypted).
[1] https://z.cash/blog/funding.html